January - 2011 Blog Archives

400 Rabbis Call On Murdoch To Sanction Beck
By: Steve - January 28, 2011 - 8:30am

Jewish Funds for Justice announced Wednesday that hundreds of rabbis have signed an open letter to Rupert Murdoch requesting that "Glenn Beck be sanctioned by Fox News for his completely unacceptable attacks on a survivor of the Holocaust and Roger Ailes apologize for his dismissive remarks about rabbis' sensitivity to how the Holocaust is used on the air."

From the Jewish Funds for Justice press release:
Hundreds of rabbis are taking News Corporation Chairman Rupert Murdoch to task in an open letter to be published Thursday in the Wall Street Journal and the Forward, demanding that he sanction Fox News Host Glenn Beck for his repeated perversion of the memory of the Holocaust. The letter also demands an apology from Fox News Chief Roger Ailes for his characterization of Jewish critics as nothing more than "left-wing rabbis."

The letter signed by rabbis from across the United States -- including the heads of the Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist movements as well as prominent Orthodox rabbis - accuses Mr. Beck and Mr. Ailes of diminishing the memory and meaning of the Holocaust.

The letter states, "In the charged political climate in the current civic debate, much is tolerated, and much is ignored or dismissed. But you diminish the memory and meaning of the Holocaust when you use it to discredit any individual or organization you disagree with. That is what Fox News has done in recent weeks, and it is not only 'left-wing rabbis' who think so."
And here is my preciction of what Fox will do to Glenn Beck, nothing, zero, zip, zilch.

The Glenn Beck Show Ratings Are Crashing
By: Steve - January 26, 2011 - 9:30am

Think back to 2010, Glenn Beck had his big right-wing rally in Washington, his ratings were going up, he was averaging about 2.6 million viewers a night, with shows that did a 2.7 and 2.9 rating, and one show even went over 3 million viewers and he beat O'Reilly for the first time ever.

Those days are now gone, and Glenn Beck is having a bad time in the ratings game. Back in February of 2010 Beck's lowest number was a 2.4, his highest number was a 3.8, and now we look at January of 2011.

For January of 2011 Beck's lowest number was a 1.5, and his highest number is a 2.9, with an average of 2.2 million total viewers.

Back in February of 2010 Beck was averaging 2.9 million viewers a night. And the last 3 days of last week the highest rating Beck had was a 1.7, with a 1.6 on Friday.

That means over the last 11 months, Beck has lost anywhere from 1 million viewers a night, to 1.6 million viewers a night. And yet, neither O'Reilly or Beck say a word about it. As they claim Beck is doing great and his ratings are through the roof.

When in reality, viewers are leaving Beck almost every day, and his ratings have crashed. But you never hear a word about it from Beck, or O'Reilly, even though they mentioned his ratings every day when they were around 2.9 million, and going up.

Jon Stewart Calls Out Fox & Megyn Kelly
By: Steve - January 26, 2011 - 8:30am

On Monday night's "Daily Show," Jon Stewart chose to pick up where he left off last week, with an expose on Nazi name-calling in Congress and the media.

Last week, Stewart had some strong words for Rep. Steve Cohen, who likened the Republican party's views on government-owned health care to Nazi lies. To his surprise, Stewart's comments were echoed all over Fox News, with everyone -- including Karl Rove -- saying Cohen should be ashamed of himself.

Stewart said this about Rove: "If that guy is telling you you should feel shame, that's like Charlie Sheen showing up at your intervention to tell you to take it down a notch."

Although the majority of Fox News pundits spoke out against Nazi name-calling, it was Megyn Kelly who took it to a hypocritical level by saying that kind of rhetoric doesn't exist on Fox News. As he does best, Stewart produced an impressive slew of clips showing Fox News pundits using Nazi comparisons, including Bill O'Reilly's mind-boggling claim that there's "no difference" between what Hitler did and what HuffPost does. But he didn't stop there. Stewart also showed more than just unfair Nazi comparisons on Fox News, but an instance of such name-calling within the same 24 hours of Megyn Kelly's comment, a Fox News pundit (Glenn Beck) making the same Joseph Goebbels comparison as Steve Cohen, Fox News President Roger Ailes calling someone Hitler, and another Nazi remark on Megyn Kelly's own show.

Then Stewart had this for Megyn Kelly: "Well, Ms. Kelly, Don't you look ridiculous now?"

And where was O'Reilly and Bernie Goldberg in reporting this bias and hypocrisy, nowhere to be found. Even though O'Reilly does a weekly media bias segment with Bernie Goldberg, they both ignored the entire story.

Not to mention, O'Reilly has Megyn Kelly on his own show once a week for the Kelly File segment, and he never said a word to her about her Fox does not use Nazi rhetoric lies.

Beck Has Not Paid Charity Money He Promised
By: Steve - January 23, 2011 - 10:30am

To all the Glenn Beck lovers, read this, your hero is a con-man, plain and simple.

According to an article that appeared in the Wilmington News Journal on January 21, 2011, Wilmington Ohio charities have not yet received the money raised by ticket sales from Glenn Beck's December event.

A lot of money changed hands in Wilmington on December 14, 15 and 16, the three days when Glenn Beck brought his talk shows and legions of fans to the city.

Putting a dollar figure on that impact, however, is still tricky more than a month later.

"That's a good question," said Laura Curliss when asked how much Beck brought in through his ticket sales and appearance fees -- a sum he said he would donate to Wilmington and Sugartree Ministries.

Curliss, the executive assistant to Wilmington Mayor David Raizk, said the city hadn't spoken with Beck's producers, and where that money will go is still up in the air. "I don't think it's fully known."

Beck's live television broadcast at the Murphy Theatre sold out all 860 seats at $125 apiece. By that count, the box office income alone could have exceeded $100,000.

And btw folks, Producers from the Glenn Beck Program would not return phone calls or email messages seeking comment or clarification.

Danny Mongold, the president of the Murphy board of trustees, said he received a check from Beck's production team last week covering the rental fee for the theater. The city was paid $10,780 for police overtime and other related costs, Curliss said.

So basically Beck paid for the theater rental and police overtime, then skipped town with hundreds of thousands of dollars, and over a month later none of the Ohio Charities have got a dime. As they say, a sucker is born every minute, and everyone who paid that $125.00 to see this con-man, got robbed.

Beck & Hannity Dropped From Philly Radio Station
By: Steve - January 22, 2011 - 9:30am

Wednesday, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity had their nationally syndicated radio shows dropped from WPHT in Philadelphia, which is the second radio station to drop both of the conservative commentators.

Just a few weeks ago, Beck was also dropped from WOR in New York, but the most recent cancellation in Philadelphia hurts Beck even more. Beck got his start in Philadelphia, and many of his radio staffers still live in Philly, including Beck's side-kick Stu. Immediately after being dropped yesterday, Beck dropped all affection for the city where he got his start, saying, "Philly sucks."

Now of course WPHT says they only dropped Beck and Hannity because they wanted more local talk content, but the most recent cancellations is most likely part of a pattern in which advertisers and broadcasters have become wary over the violent rhetoric spouted by right-wing hate radio.

Color of Change reports that, so far, 81 companies have quit advertising on Beck's Fox News show. Something that O'Reilly never mentions, he covers it up then claims Beck is not spewing hate, while 81 corporate advertisers have pulled their ads from the Beck show because of his hate speech and his violent rhetoric.

O'Reilly also claims that Beck said he was sorry for calling Obama a racist, and that it has not hurt him at all. Which is another lie, because most of those 81 advertisers that pulled their ads, did so because Beck called Obama a racist.

Fox News Least Trusted Cable News Network
By: Steve - January 21, 2011 - 8:30am

Guess who failed to report this poll, that would be Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck, I guess they just forgot, yeah that's it. Most likely they forgot to report it because it shows that Fox is the least trusted news network in all of cable news.

O'Reilly rails on and on about how Fox gets such high ratings because you can trust them to tell the truth. Except that is a total lie, what the PPP poll shows is that Fox is the least trusted cable news network, with everyone but Republicans.

What it also shows is that Fox gets high ratings only because a lot of Republicans watch their shows, plain and simple. Now here are some findings from the second annual Public Policy Polling tv news trust poll.

A year ago a plurality of Americans said they trusted Fox News. Now a plurality of them don't. Conservatives haven't moved all that much - 75% said they trusted it last year and 72% still do this time around.

But moderates and liberals have both had a strong increase in their level of distrust for the Fox network - a 12 point gain from 48% to 60% for moderates and a 16 point gain from 66% to 82% for liberals.

Voters between left and center tend to be more trusting of the media across the board, which is why a fair number of them were still rating Fox favorably even a year ago at this time. But it looks like with a lot of those folks it has finally crossed the line to being too political to trust.

Fox was dead last in trust for cable news networks, it went from 49% trust and 39% distrust last year, to 42% trust and 46% distrust this year. Which is a 16 point increase in distrust in one short year.

Now think about this, since the very same poll taken last year had Fox at 49% trust and 37% distrust, O'Reilly and Beck can not claim it is just some liberal polling group out to smear Fox, which is the best part of the poll, and probably the #1 reason O'Reilly and Beck are not reporting it, after he did last year.

O'Reilly and Beck are not reporting it simply because they can not claim they are a liberal smear machine, and they are also not reporting it because it shows that only Republicans trust Fox to report the news.

Here are some more details from the poll.

All three of the traditional major networks - NBC, CBS, and ABC, have seen an increase in their trust levels over the last year. NBC continues to be the most trusted of the trio, breaking even this year at 41% who trust it and 41% who don't.

Conservatives distrust all three of the networks at pretty similar levels - 66% for ABC and NBC, 67% for CBS. But liberals range from 52% who trust ABC to 61% who trust CBS all the way up to 67% who trust NBC.

It's interesting to see that faith in these long standing organizations is on the rise but it may be that in a new media world where there's so much more information available than there's ever been before folks are looking to places with a proven track record of getting it right.

Democrats trust everything but Fox. Republicans don't trust anything but Fox. And independents don't trust much of anything.

-- For Democrats 73% trust PBS, 64% NBC, 61% CBS, 60% CNN, 56% ABC, and 22% Fox.

-- For Republicans 67% trust Fox, 29% PBS, 22% CNN, 21% NBC, 17% ABC, and 15% CBS.

-- For independents 44% trust PBS, 36% Fox, 34% CNN, 33% NBC, 27% CBS, and 26% ABC.

Overall PBS was #1, do you see this O'Reilly you lying right-wing jackass, PBS was the most trusted with 50% trust, to 30% distrust.

NBC News (including MSNBC) was #2, with 41% trust to 41% distrust.

CNN was #3, with 40% trust to 43% distrust.

Fox was last with 42% trust to 46% distrust.

Now read this carefully folks, because you will never see this reported by O'Reilly or Beck, or anyone at Fox.

Beck Goes Off The Deep End (Part 121)
By: Steve - January 20, 2011 - 8:00am

Okay folks, now Glenn Beck claims the IRS is the most brutal collection agency on earth. Yes he really said that, with all the dishonest and corrupt collection agencies in America, do you really believe the IRS is the worst.

Here is what the crazy Glenn Beck said:



Now remember this, the IRS simply collects taxes, if you pay your taxes you will never be in contact with an IRS tax collector in your life. And 99% of the time when you owe some back taxes you just pay it and a small penalty, and you never even see a collector.

Scarborough Slams Palin & Beck For Violent Rhetoric
By: Steve - January 19, 2011 - 9:00am

In a January 18 Politico column, Republican Joe Scarborough criticized Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin for their violent rhetoric, saying this: "Despite what we eventually learned about the shooter in Tucson, should the right have really been so shocked that many feared a political connection between the heated rhetoric of 2010 and the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords?"

More from Scarborough's column:
We get it, Sarah Palin. You're not morally culpable for the tragic shooting in Tucson, Ariz. All of us around the "Morning Joe" table agree, even if we were stunned that you would whine about yourself on Facebook as a shattered family prepared to bury their 9-year-old girl.

The same goes for you, Glenn Beck. You've attacked your political opponents with words designed to inspire hatred and mind-bending conspiracy theories from fans. Calling the president a racist, Marxist and fascist may be reprehensible, but it did not lead a mentally disturbed man to take a Glock to Rep. Gabrielle Giffords's "Congress on Your Corner" event.

Good on you, buddy. You weren't personally responsible for the slaughter at the Safeway. Maybe you can put it on a poster at the next "Talkers" convention.

But before you and the pack of right-wing polemicists who make big bucks spewing rage on a daily basis congratulate yourselves for not being responsible for Jared Lee Loughner's rampage, I recommend taking a deep breath.

Just because the dots between violent rhetoric and violent actions don't connect in this case doesn't mean you can afford to ignore the possibility -- or, as many fear, the inevitability -- that someone else will soon draw the line between them.

Actually, someone already has. When you get a minute, Google "Byron Williams" and "Tides Foundation" to see just how thin a layer of ice Beck skates on every day.
And now, I would like to point out a couple things. Palin is now crying that the left is trying to silence her and take away her free speech rights, because they simply call on her to tone down the violent gun rhetoric.

To begin with, that is ridiculous. Because nobody is saying she can not say what she wants to, they are just saying she could do it without the gun talk, like reload instead of retreat, and using scope crosshairs on a target map, so she is lying. Nobody is telling her to shut up, as she claims, they are just saying she should use different words to attack the people she does not like.

And 2nd, she claims that only the left is trying to shut her up, when a few Republicans have also slammed her for the scope crosshairs map, and the violent gun rhetoric. So she is lying again, because it is not only the left saying it, a few people on the right are saying it too, like Scarborough, Buchanan, and even Tim Pawlenty.

Think about this too, O'Reilly is doing the same thing Palin is, he is also saying the left is trying to shut her up. While also ignoring what Scarborough, Buchanan, and Pawlenty are saying.

O'Reilly does this on purpose, to make it look like the left is crazy to attack Palin, and that they only do it for partisan reasons, and because they hate her. As he ignores the fact that Scarborough, Buchanan, and Pawlenty like Palin, they are Republicans, and they are also saying the violent gun rhetoric and the crosshairs map was wrong.

O'Reilly ignores that, and does not report what those 3 Republicans have said about her and Beck. Because it would destroy his spin that only the left is saying it for partisan reasons.

Not to mention, O'Reilly never said a word about the Byron Williams attempted killing of liberals at the Tides Foundation, who did it based on what Beck was saying about them on his Fox News show.

Williams even admitted he was motivated to do it because of what Beck reported about them, and he called Beck his teacher. And O'Reilly ignored the entire story, he never said one word about it. Then he claims nobody has ever done anything violent based on what Beck or Palin have said or done.

When they have, and we can prove it. Williams said he was going to kill liberals at the TIDES Foundation because Glenn Beck told him they were evil. If that is not proof of a direct link to what Beck said and a violent act, nothing is, and I'm Elvis.

And if Palin is so innocent, why did she take the scope crosshair target map with Giffords name on it down the day of the shooting. If there was nothing wrong with it, as she claims, she would not have taken it down after the shooting. Taking it down is an admission that it was wrong to have it up in the first place.

Jewish Group Calls For Beck To Be Fired
By: Steve - January 18, 2011 - 7:00am

Jewish Funds for Justice (JSFJ) has called on News Corporation Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch to fire Glenn Beck, due to what JSFJ President Simon Greer calls Beck's "Jewish problem." Greer cited Beck's attacks on George Soros, and on the largely Jewish "Rogues Gallery."

The JSFJ also accused both Beck and fellow Fox News employee Sarah Palin of "abusing two of the most tragic episodes in the history of the Jewish people: the Holocaust and the blood libel." From the Jewish Chronicle:
More than 10,000 people have signed an American Jewish organisation's petition calling on Rupert Murdoch to fire controversial pundit Glenn Beck because of his "grotesque falsehoods" about Jews.

Jewish Funds for Justice (JFSJ) launched the petition following the showing of Mr Beck's recent three-part series "Puppet Master" on Fox News. The channel is part of Mr Murdoch's media empire.

On the programme Mr Beck attacked Jewish businessman George Soros' Holocaust record and accused him of helping "to send the Jews to the death camps".

He also suggested Mr Soros was a "puppet master...at the centre" of the economic crisis and made the comment in front of a picture of a star or David.

JFSJ said Mr Beck seemed "to draw his material straight from the antisemitic forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion".

The group also criticised a programme earlier this month in which Mr Beck examined the nine public figures of the last century who created "the era of the big lie". The list included Jewish psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud and Jewish writer Walter Lippman.

The JFSJ president, Simon Greer, said: "We find it hard to believe that it was only coincidence that eight of the nine individuals on his list alleging a shadowy alliance to control the Americans through propaganda were Jewish."

Last week Mr Greer accused Fox News of having "a Jewish problem", in the wake of the furore over Mr Beck's fellow Fox presenter Sarah Palin's claim the media had created a blood libel against her.

He said: "In the past two months, Ms Palin and Mr Beck, the most well-known media personalities on Fox News, have abused two of the most tragic episodes in the history of the Jewish people: the Holocaust and the blood libel.

"These denigrate the very real pain so many Jews have suffered."

Mr Greer and his supporters attempted to hand the petition to Mr Murdoch's staff at the News International headquarters in New York yesterday, but were stopped by security. They have pledged to post it instead.
And I would say the odds of Fox firing Beck is less than zero, he is a hero to the right, and the management at Fox. So they are never going to fire him, even though he should be, it is never going to happen.

Brock Links 3 Violent Acts To Glenn Beck
By: Steve - January 14, 2011 - 8:00am

During an interview on MSNBC's Hardball, Media Matters President and CEO David Brock accused Glenn Beck of being "responsible for three thwarted assassination attempts this year."

In each of the three examples Brock cited -- Gregory Giusti, Charles Wilson, and Byron Williams -- the incendiary and often violent rhetoric spewed by the Fox News host was said to be a motivating factor, if not the inspiring factor, in the men's actions.

On January 12, Brock appeared on Hardball to discuss the violent rhetoric on cable news shows. During the exchange with host Chris Matthews, Brock said that Glenn Beck himself has been responsible for three thwarted assassination attempts this year. Here is a partial transcript:
MATTHEWS: I think we used to say, maybe back in the Churchillian age, your voice was your power, your ability to speak up. That's certainly Norman Rockwell's notion, the man, you know -- the standing up at a meeting, at a public meeting and saying, "Here's what I believe." But, now, it's standing up with your arms, standing up with your ammo, your gun sites, your bull's eye.

Why do you have -- this is a problem I have with the tea party. Why so many guns at these events? Why constantly referring to guns? What is it? Is it a throwback to the revolutionary age? They think they're in an armed revolution?

BROCK: Right. What does the tea party moniker stand for? Armed rebellion, right? This has been a theme of the Republican candidates and of Sarah Palin all year.

MATTHEWS: Excuse me. History lesson: The Boston tea party was a nonviolent economic statement against the Stamp Act, I believe. They threw the tea in the water. No guns.

BROCK: That's right.

MATTHEWS: They dressed up like Indians. It was a demonstration. It was street theater, OK? No guns.

BROCK: But this is not street theater, as you know. I mean, Glenn Beck himself has been responsible for three thwarted assassination attempts this year, and Sarah Palin hasn't condemned that.

MATTHEWS: How is he responsible for them?

BROCK: Well, you want to know what they are?

MATTHEWS: You said it.

BROCK: Yeah, sure. So, he burned Nancy Pelosi in effigy on his set. He tried to poison her with a chalice, OK? Some weeks later, somebody tried to firebomb Nancy Pelosi's house. That guy's mother went on television and said he gets all of his ideas from Fox News. Do you know about Senator Patty Murray and the death threat that she got?

MATTHEWS: No, go ahead.

BROCK: OK. It's recorded -- the guy says after the health care vote. He says you have a target on your back and I can accomplish what I want to accomplish with one bullet. Now he's tried, convicted, and in the sentencing phase, his cousin writes in for leniency, and she describes in a very chilling memo -- it's on our website -- that he was slowly drawn into Glenn Beck's world. And she portrays the guy, the attempted assassin, Charlie Wilson, as a victim of Beck.

And number three, which you probably do know about, this liberal Tides foundation in San Francisco was targeted by a gunman, Byron Williams, in June. The shooter gave jailhouse interviews, and we published them, and he says Glenn Beck is this schoolteacher on television and points to specific episodes of the Glenn Beck show that inspired him do it.
All 3 of them are Republicans who watch Fox, and they all quoted Beck, and admitted to watching his show. One of them even said Beck was his teacher, and he does what Beck says. One guys mother said he was watching Fox News 24/7 and that led to what he tried to do.

And now think about this, how come O'Reilly does not mention any of this, he has totally ignored it, as he denies that Beck is inciting violence. When we have the proof he does, O'Reilly just ignores it then pretends it never happened.

Scarborough Slams Beck For Violent Rhetoric
By: Steve - January 12, 2011 - 9:00am

Think about this, Beck says he never uses violent rhetoric, then someone slams him for using violent rhetoric, and that someone is a Republican this time. Not to mention, Beck is lying when he says he never uses violent rhetoric, and everyone knows it.

On the Tuesday 1-11-11 Joe Scarborough show Joe slammed Beck for the words he uses, and said it will have a corrosive impact on our politics.



Now you know you are doing something wrong when a fellow Republican slams you for it. Beck knows he is using violent rhetoric, and that is a fact, he just refuses to admit it because then he would have to admit what he is doing is wrong, and he will never do that.

A Few Republicans Admit Violent Rhetoric Is Bad
By: Steve - January 11, 2011 - 10:00am

Most Republicans are defending the violent rhetoric from people like Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Michelle Bachmann, etc. But a few are admitting it is wrong, and that it needs to stop.

And what makes it worse is that most Republicans are saying the left is wrong to attack Palin and Beck for the violent rhetoric, including O'Reilly, who went after the media and the left, for simply saying the violent rhetoric and rifle scope crosshairs on a target map is wrong.

Here is a question for Beck and O'Reilly, if the Palin scope crosshair icon target map was not wrong, why did she take it off her website after Giffords was shot, answer that one a-holes.

Conservatives and tea party activists have reacted with rage to what they view as accusations from the left that they are somehow responsible for this weekend's massacre in Arizona that targeted Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ).

In reality, progressives are not trying to assign blame or argue that shooter Jared Lee Loughner is a member of any political movement, but rather to point out that words have consequences. Political and pundit leaders need to be aware that their words will reach the serious and the crazy, and that their rhetoric should not serve to inflame ignorance.

Some conservatives understand this. An unnamed senior Republican senator told Politico yesterday that "there is a need for some reflection here -- what is too far now?"

And on MSNBC Monday morning, former GOP congressman Joe Scarbrough and conservative Pat Buchanan agreed that right-wing firebrands like former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) should apologize for their violent rhetoric -- not to assume any culpability for the tragedy, but to simply acknowledge that "they've been irresponsible in their rhetoric."
SCARBOROUGH: So Pat, is this not a time for people, like Sarah Palin, who have used violent imagery - she just has. I know some of my conservative friends and family members won't like that reality. Or, Michele Bachmann, who said she wants Minnesotans armed and dangerous.

Isn't this an opportune time for them to apologize -– not saying that it led to anything — but just saying that they've been irresponsible in their rhetoric and they're going to be more careful moving forward? I am just saying though, I mean, God, you've worked for two presidents. Would you not be in there if you were working for Sarah Palin right now, saying, go out and say it had nothing to do with this shooting, but you understand that it was irresponsible, and you’re going to be more careful moving forward. Wouldn't you give her that advice if you were her aide?

PAT: Well, I certainly would. I would give everybody the advice to tone down the rhetoric and get away from military and the armed metaphors and things that a lot of us have used in campaigns, especially at a time like this. You know, I sure would Joe.
Now think about this, you have two conservatives saying that, not liberals. But O'Reilly was spinning it to claim only the left is saying Palin, Beck, Angle, and Bachmann need to tone it down. Earth to O'Reilly, it's not just the left saying tone it down.

Beck Says He Never Uses Violent Rhetoric
By: Steve - January 11, 2011 - 9:30am

Now this is a 100% flat out lie, because Beck has used violent rhetoric at least 10 times I can think of, probably more. He uses the word revolution almost every day, he calls for people to take up arms to defend your country, he talked about piling up bodies on the steps in Washington, and he even called for current and former members of the military, especially special forces troops to join the revolution. if that's not violent rhetoric what the hell is it.

Here is a clip of the Beck denial:



In fact, Beck probably uses more violent rhetoric than anybody in the tv news business, and to deny it is ridiculous. It's like O'Reilly denying he is a partisan, when he agrees with the Republicans 99% of the time, and he has 95% right-wing guests on his show to spin out right-wing propaganda.

Beck is either lying, or he is delusional, maybe even both. Because when you constantly talk revolution, and ask for the military to join the revolution, you are using violent rhetoric. Not to mention the Nazi stuff, which is also violent rhetoric that could lead someone to do something violent.

Republican Wants To Repeal Food Safety Law
By: Steve - January 10, 2011 - 8:30am

As if you needed more proof Republicans are insane, just read this. Tuesday, President Obama signed into law a food safety bill that upgrades the ability of the Food and Drug Administration to prevent and respond to outbreaks of foodborne illness. The bill passed the Senate by unanimous consent last month, and the House passed it on a 215-144 vote, with ten Republicans joining all but eight Democrats in affirming the measure.

Despite this bipartisan support, the incoming Republican leadership in the House is threatening to defund the bill, the implementation of which requires $1.4 billion over the next five years, mostly to hire new food inspectors. The bill is officially deficit neutral, according to the Congressional Budget Office, as it raises fees to offset its cost, but Congressional appropriators still need to okay the FDA to spend the money.

Now think about that for a minute, it's a lousy $1.4 billion over 5 years, and it's paid for, so it does not add a dime to the deficit. But Republicans are still going to try and kill it by defunding it, when it will be used to hire new food inspectors so we can have safe food to eat.

And remember this, one out of six Americans suffer from a foodborne illness every year, with 128,000 of those resulting in hospitalization, and 3,000 people die from foodborne illness each year, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. The law gives the FDA the ability to force recalls, which it currently is barred from doing, and do more to inspect food coming into the country.

But Rep. Jack Kingston (R-GA), the incoming chairman of the appropriations subcommittee charged with the FDA budget, says we do not need more food inspectors. Kingston said this:
KINGSTON: There's a high possibility of trimming this whole package back, Kingston said yesterday in a telephone interview.

While it's a great re-election tool to terrify people into thinking that the food they're eating is unsafe and unsanitary, and if not for the wonderful nanny-state politicians we'd be getting sick after every meal, the system we have is doing a darn good job.
This is madness, it cost nothing and we will have more food inspectors, who could be against that, I'll tell you who, the idiots in the Republican party, that's who.

Aside from the public health benefits, the bill will actually save taxpayers money, while costing them nothing. According to Georgetown University's Produce Safety Project, foodborne illness costs the U.S. $152 billion a year.

And of course O'Reilly never says a word about it, or call them pinheads, because he is a Republican and he does not want to make his friends look bad, so he ignores the whole story.

Major Media Markets Dropping Beck's Radio Show
By: Steve - January 6, 2011 - 9:30am

Beck's radio network that launched the one-time failed "Morning Zoo" jock to national stardom in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks is going downhill fast. Because of low ratings. Beck will be off the air in America's largest media market, New York City, in a matter of days.
WOR (710 AM), one of the city's two biggest talk radio stations, said Tuesday morning it is dropping Beck's syndicated show as of Jan. 17 and replacing him with a familiar New York name: Mike Gallagher.

"The reason is ratings," said WOR program director Scott Lakefield. "Somewhat to our surprise, the show wasn't getting what we wanted."
To call this a major embarassment for Beck is an understatement. After all, he's been based in New York, where he tapes his nightly television show for Fox News Channel for the last four years. And he's not being replaced by some hot new up-and-coming talent, but a lower-priced and unexciting retread in longtime veteran Gallagher -- a clear sign that WOR isn't bluffing or exaggerating to say that Beck's ratings in the Big Apple were truly awful.

And that's not all, by Jan. 17 Beck is all but certain to be off the air in another major U.S. market, Philadelphia. When it was announced last fall that Philly's WPHT, then known as "The Big Talker," was adopting a more locally oriented format and dumping both Beck and Sean Hannity, there was widespread speculation that another local station would rush to pick up the right-wing free agents. That has not happened, and their Philadelphia run is slated to end next week.

There is also evidence that New York and Philadelphia are not a fluke, that Beck is bombing generally in the nation's population center on the Eastern Seaboard:
Despite a lineup featuring Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity, conservative-based "Rush Radio" has yet to gain any traction with listeners in Boston.

The latest Arbitron PPM rankings have Clear Channel's WXKS-AM mired toward the bottom of the Beantown ratings heap, with an overall 0.7 in the November PPM and a cume of 81,000.

The Boston Herald reported that WXKS has a 0.2 rating and 45th place in the 25-54 demographic. That's lower than when the station played Spanish music.
These developments could have a significant and concrete impact on the radio side of Beck's business empire, because major national advertisers typically demand exposure in all top-10 national media markets, something that Beck will soon no longer be able to provide.

Clearly, Beck's reactionary message doesn't resonate in some of the more progressive bastions of the East Coast; Beck's movie-theatre events like "The Christmas Sweater" or "Broke" performed poorly in seaboard venues.

There may be a deeper problem for the radio host. Beck's radical anti-Obama message "we surround them" struck a chord with a newly scared minority of hardcore conservatives, but since then Beck's warnings and pronouncements have grown increasingly apocalyptic and dire in order to build and hold his audience, yet his predictions, hyperinflation, for example, which he also uses to pitch gold coins -- have not come true.

His short-term-successful efforts to cash in on his popularity have led to a strategy of massive overexposure, epitomized by the 8/28 rally in Washington but also including several books, and a non-stop schedule of public events with massive ticket prices, often $130 a ticket to hear him speak.

One such appearance at New Jersey's Great Adventure, drew a tiny crowd, an early hint of his radio ratings problems. So now Beck starts 2011 not by retrenching but by expanding, with new offerings, more paid content on the Internet and more shrill and desparate warnings about the fate of the Republic.

Like I said folks, beck is a con man who is getting rich by lying to the right-wing suckers who believe his nonsense. He is getting as much money as he can, while he can, before his house of cards goes crashing down. But by then he will be wealthy enough to retire, on the backs of all you fools who bought his massive con game.

Beck Admits He Has Said Some Crazy Things
By: Steve - January 5, 2011 - 8:30am

Then he said another crazy thing, that the crazy things he has said are happening, and that he was right. On his Tuesday Fox show, Beck said this: "I Have Said Some Pretty Outrageous Things, Some Things That Were Crazy."



Now get this, Beck claims some of the crazy things he has said are happening. Which is even more crazy than him admitting he says crazy things, because nothing he has said will happen, has actually happened.

He got one thing right, he has said some crazy things. But that's it, because none of his crazy predictions have come true. Beck just makes it up, and then he hopes someone will believe it, and he stays on the air spewing that nonsense out.
Beck Polls

Beck Danger Poll
Do You Think Glenn Beck is a dangerous Right-Wing Liar

Yes
No
Not Sure

FOX News Poll
Who is The Worst Anchor on FOX News

Glenn Beck
Bill O'Reilly
Sean Hannity

Beck Racist Poll
Should Beck be Fired For Calling Obama a Racist

Yes
No
Not Sure
Blogroll

oreilly-sucks.com
Think Progress
Buzzflash
Bartcop
AmericaBlog
Crooks & Liars
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Truthout.com
Unknown News
Daily Beacon
Mike Hersh
Prison Planet
Moose & Squirrel
Politics & Society
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
I Hate Hannity
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
LT Saloon




Friends Websites